Değil Hakkında Detaylar bilinen C# IList Kullanımı

Değil Hakkında Detaylar bilinen C# IList Kullanımı

Blog Article

Note that, if your API is only going to be used in foreach loops, etc, then you might want to consider just exposing IEnumerable instead.

1 @supercat: What could ISortableList offer that's derece already in IList? Or, asked differently, why couldn't an IList be sorted in-place without re-adding the items by your imagined static method?

Important Some information relates to prerelease product that may be substantially modified before it’s released. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information provided here.

All concepts are basically stated in most of the answers above regarding why use interface over concrete implementations.

The accepted answer by @DavidMills is quite good, but I think it can be improved upon. For one, there is no need to define the ComparisonComparer class when the framework already includes a static method Comparer.Create(Comparison). This method sevimli be used to create an IComparison on the fly.

I would turn the question around a bit, instead of justifying why you should use the interface over the concrete implementation, try to justify why you would use the concrete implementation rather than the interface. If you can't justify it, use the interface.

You are most often better of using the most general usable type, C# IList Kullanımı in this case the IList or even better the IEnumerable interface, so that you emanet switch the implementation conveniently at a later time.

You emanet look at this argument from several angles including the one of a purely OO approach which says to yetişek against an Interface hamiş an implementation. With this thought, using IList follows the C# IList Nasıl Kullanılır same principal birli passing around and using Interfaces that you define from scratch. I also believe in the scalability and flexibility factors provided by an Interface in general. If a class implmenting IList needs to be extended or changed, the consuming code does hamiş have to change; C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız it knows what the IList Interface contract adheres C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız to.

Whether you return an Interface or a concrete type depends upon what you want to let your callers do with the object you created -- this is an API C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız design decision, and there's no hard and fast rule. You have to weigh their ability to make full use of the object against their ability to easily use a portion of the objects functionality (and of course whether you WANT them to be making full use of the object).

Why does the Clausius inequality involve a single term/integral if we consider a body interacting with multiple heat sources/sinks?

However, this makes the method more fragile, bey any change to the returned object type may break the calling code. In practice though, that generally isn't a major sıkıntı.

Data Ambarlama: Uygulamalarda gelgeç verileri veya işleme esnasında oluşan verileri depolamak karınin kullanılabilir.

I have two ILists of the same type returned by NHibernate and have emerged the two IList into one, hence the need for sorting.

would I run into problems with this? Since could they derece pass in an array(that başmaklık a fixed size)? Would it be better maybe for a concrete List?